US Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Has 10-Year Backlog Of Claims

It may take more than 10 years for someone injured by a COVID-19 vaccine to receive a decision on whether their claim is eligible for compensation by the government’s vaccine compensation program-if they receive a response at all.

The average award was a mere $3,700, whereas the average payout under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program that handles injuries caused by routine vaccines is $490,000.

Vaccine-Injured Community Left ‘Very Disappointed’ The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic met to discuss the federal government’s post-marketing surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine safety and the process for adjudicating compensation claims in the first session of a multi-part hearing titled “Assessing America’s Vaccine Safety Systems, Part 1.”.

People injured by a vaccine covered by the PREP Act can only seek compensation through the CICP. The VICP was established by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, based on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Russell Bruesewitz et al.

That gave vaccine manufacturers, doctors, and other vaccine administrators broad liability protections when a government recommended or mandated vaccine causes permanent injury or death.

“While the white house earmarks $10 billion for COVID vaccine distribution and vaccine confidence, the COVID vaccine injured have been paid $41,000,” Ms. Dressen said.

“The numbers speak louder than any of these officials trying to tell us otherwise. Addressing the failures with vaccine injury compensation is not a priority on The Hill.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/us-vaccine-injury-compensation-program-has-10-year-backlog-of-claims-5590216?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge&src_src=partner&src_cmp=ZeroHedge

Pfizer To Rake In Trillions From Turbo Cancer Deaths, Insider Claims

Turbo cancer is set to claim the lives of hundreds of millions, if not billions, of people in the next few years, according to a Pfizer insider who warns that everybody vaccinated with mRNA is a walking, talking time bomb waiting to explode.

Pfizer stunned the medical world in December, completing the $43 billion acquisition of Seagen, a small drug company that treats turbo cancers and barely makes $2 billion per year.

Why would Pfizer, flush with the enormous profits it has reaped through its mRNA vaccine, overpay $43 billion for a tiny cancer drug company?

First, it must be understood that Pfizer and Moderna Covid mRNA vaccines are causing turbo cancers at rates previously unseen in the history of the world.

It’s not the first time a Pfizer insider has blown the whistle and the mainstream media has done everything they can to cover up the news.

Pfizer executive Janine Small made a bombshell admission during a hearing in October of the European Union’s COVID-19 response.

Member of the European Parliament Rob Roos asked Small if Pfizer even bothered testing whether or not the vaccine prevented transmission. 

Sudden Deaths Of Vaxxed Athletes, Students, Pilots, Military, But Why No Politicians?

Sadly, the sudden athlete deaths haven’t stopped, and there’s now strong evidence that the Covid-19 vaccines drive up the risk of cardiac issues.

Who are the monsters who ordered, and mandated that college students, military, government employees, and school children take a vaccine they did not need? And why?

The Globe has been told by State Capitol staffers that members of the Assembly and Senate are exempted from COVID vaccine mandates, but Capitol staffers are not, and in fact are required to receive a booster by March 1st. How does mandating COVID vaccines and boosters for one group of Capitol employees, and exempting their bosses make any scientific sense? Where are the lawyers?

What about his administration – did any of them receive a vaccine, or were they exempted?

“Several Capitol staffers say lawmakers are not mandated to receive the COVID vaccine, but Capitol staffers are. This has come up again as they say they will be required to get a COVID booster by March 1st. Can you tell me what the Capitol COVID vaccine policy is for lawmakers, Capitol staff and visitors to the Capitol? If lawmakers are not mandated to vaccinate, how frequently must they test?”.

“One in a thousand versus one in a million – that makes the COVID shot 1,000 times riskier than other, more traditional, vaccines. And California’s numbers are reflective of national figures.”

It’s looking like many never really took the shot Yet when I had a physical in 2022, my doctor was disinterested in the antibody test I had showing strong antibodies after having had COVID in early 2020, but did offer me a COVID mRNA shot, the flu vaccine, a pneumonia vaccine and the shingles vaccine. 

Global Reckoning Coming: Australian Court Rules Employers Who Mandated Covid Jabs Liable For Injuries

Employers who mandated their staff to take Covid-19 vaccines and boosters can be held liable for injuries caused by the experimental vaccines, according to a bombshell ruling by the South Australian Employment Tribunal.

The ruling means that employers can no longer claim they are protected from liability because they were complying with a lawful government directive.

A global reckoning is coming and the governments and employers whose cowardly vaccine mandates caused millions of deaths and injuries are going to be held accountable for their crimes against humanity.

This heart condition resulted from a mandated third dose of COVID-19 vaccine imposed by his employer, the Department of Child Protection.

As a consequence, Shepherd is now incapacitated and unable to perform regular duties, reflecting a sadly familiar narrative in the Australian workforce subjected to stringent vaccine mandates.

His supervisor mandated the third jab within four months of the second as a condition of his employment.

Employers faced legal risks as state governments delegated mandate enforcement to workplace managers, threatening them with severe financial penalties for non-compliance.

Email Leak: CDC Buried Its Own Myocarditis Warning In MAY 2021

“In May 2021, CDC officials drafted an alert on myocarditis and the two most widely used COVID-19 shots, according to the newly obtained document, which is being made public for the first time by The Epoch Times.”

Happy to discuss,’ Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, the CDC’s top official for equity in COVID-19 data and engagement, told two other high-ranking CDC colleagues in the email.

The CDC started receiving reports of post-vaccination myocarditis in January 2021 and either failed to detect or ignored a safety signal for myocarditis and the mRNA shots the following month.

“The newly disclosed email is dated May 21, 2021. That’s three days before a CDC workgroup acknowledged for the first time that the number of reported myocarditis cases after COVID-19 vaccination was higher than expected, and a week before the CDC said it was still recommending that virtually all Americans 12 years and up receive a vaccine.”

In private, the CDC was well aware, from the very start of the injection campaign, of the heart swelling risks presented to healthy teenagers who did not need vaccination in the first place against COVID. Simultaneously, in public, the agency was coercing everyone over 12 years of age to get injected based on no scientific evidence, the initial Pfizer trial itself being provably fraudulent.

“Rep. Jim Jordan on Monday posted evidence on X that the Biden White House leaned on Amazon in 2021 to censor books that it considered to be promoting ‘misinformation’ about the COVID-19 vaccines. Andy Slavitt, a senior Biden official, emailed Amazon asking, ‘Who can we talk to about the high levels of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation of [sic] Amazon?'”.

“Amazon caved to the pressure and started flagging books that the administration didn’t like with an internal Do Not Promote tag, limiting their reach. Additionally, an Amazon executive reassured the Biden administration that the company had also taken ‘a number of [other] actions to not show misleading content on vaccinations.”

https://armageddonprose.substack.com/p/email-leak-cdc-buried-its-own-myocarditis

CDC’s Own Scientists Found Masks Ineffective For COVID

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s own scientists conducted studies showing N95 respirators are no more effective at stopping viruses than surgical masks – yet the agency issued guidance contradicting those and other studies showing both types of masks are ineffective at stopping the spread of COVID-19, according to an investigation by independent journalist Paul D. Thacker.

Thacker said CDC scientists found no difference between N95 and surgical masks in the ability to stop the spread of respiratory viruses.

More evidence contradicting the CDC’s public position came at a June 2023 CDC meeting in Atlanta, when Erin Stone, MPH, a public health analyst in the agency’s Office of Guidelines and Evidence Review, presented the findings of a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of N95 respirators and surgical masks.

“Laboratory studies have demonstrated that FFRs provide greater protection against aerosols compared with surgical masks however, the results of clinical studies have been inconclusive,” the CDC wrote, citing a 2019 study in JAMA comparing N95 respirators to masks.

Four years after the onset of the pandemic, the CDC now openly cheerleads for masks, despite research the agency published showing that masks don’t really protect people from catching viruses, he said.

Thacker said his investigation shows that “In their guidance to the CDC, experts do recommend masks as part of what they call ‘transmission-based guidance’ which the CDC defines as a second tier of infection control.” However, the CDC’s own guidance also finds that masks are effective only for “Source control” – preventing an already infected person from infecting others.

“MMWR publications pertaining to masks drew positive conclusions about mask effectiveness >75% of the time despite only 30% testing masks and <15% having statistically significant results. No studies were randomized, yet over half drew causal conclusions.” 

Media Mistakes in the Biden Era: the Definitive List

Oct. 28, 2022 Numerous media outlets were duped into falsely reporting that, upon Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter, Musk fired engineers “Rahul Ligma” and “Daniel Johnson.” In fact, the two men simply posed as fired engineers and the reporters apparently did nothing to confirm the men were who they said they were, or that the events the men described had actually happened.

Nov. 12, 2021 The Washington Post belatedly “Corrected two articles and altered a dozen others” regarding its false reporting about the anti-Trump opposition research compiled by Democratic operative and ex-British spy Christopher Steele to use against then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Oct. 23, 2021 An article in Medscape states that myocarditis, a form of heart inflammation reported in some people- particularly in young people and children- after Covid-19 vaccination is “Rare and temporary. However, scientists say the disorder can have permanent impacts and even be fatal. It’s unclear why Medscape misstates the potential outcome. Medscape Mayo Clinic 33. Tues. Oct. 19, 2021 These media mistakes took place over a period of time, but came to widespread attention as a result of a Joe Rogan podcast with CNN’s Sanjay Gupta, in which Gupta acknowledged his network’s misreporting. CNN falsely reported that Rogan had taken a”horse” medicine for Covid-19.

Sept. 27, 2021 Some media, such as Axios, began deleting their unsupported reporting that claimed Border Patrol agents were whipping Haitian immigrants who had illegally crossed the border.

Sept. 9, 2021 Washington Post reporter Jacob Bogage broke the news that U.S. Postal Service workers were not included in President Biden’s Covid-19 vaccine mandate.

Monday Aug. 30, 2021 Scientific findings effectively debunked reporting by media outlets such as Wired, which reported that social media videos showing Covid-19 vaccine injuries in January were “dangerous” misinformation.

Sunday August 8, 2021 USA Today’s Gabe Lacques, ESPN, The Denver Post, The Washington Post, Associated Press, the New York Post, and other publications report, as if true without attribution, that a fan shouted a racial slur at a Miami Marlins player.

Saturday July 24, 2021 The Associated Press corrects a story published July 24, 2021 that falsely claimed Florida had changed to weekly reporting on Covid-19 cases earlier in the month.

Wednesday June 2, 2021 The Washington Post joins a cacophony of other media in finally correcting their false reporting that incorrectly claimed, early and often, that the Covid-19 “lab theory” was a “debunked” “conspiracy theory.

If NPR inserts such opinions and attacks in its news reporting, it should label them as opinions, or attribute them to a source, rather than claiming them to be fact.

Friday, Jan. 8, 2021 The New York Times reporters Marc Santora, Megan Specia and Mike Baker report Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick was killed by “pro-Trump supporters” who “overpowered” him and “struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher. 

More Here:  https://sharylattkisson.com/2024/02/media-mistakes-in-the-biden-era-the-definitive-list/

CDC overrules mask advisers and its own research finding ‘no difference’ between N95, surgical

A year ago, the Cochrane research collaborative drastically revised its review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on masking, deeming them “inconclusive” and finding that masks make “little to no difference” against COVID-19 or influenza. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is following suit by pressuring its advisers to revise their recommendations on masking in healthcare settings.

The White House’s promise to authorize COVID boosters before the Food and Drug Administration had evaluated them led the agency’s top two vaccine regulators to resign. The CDC’s Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) is reviewing the evidence for the effectiveness of surgical masks versus N95 respirators in healthcare settings. A presentation at HICPAC’s meeting last summer found “no difference” between the two, while emphasizing concerns with the evidence.

A draft “systematic review and meta-analysis” confirmed no difference for lab-confirmed infections. However, N95s did better for “self-reported” infections, but respirators were also more frequently reported for difficulty breathing, headaches, dizziness, and fatigue. HICPAC is adding “subject matter experts” to the committee to help answer its questions, which could imply that the agency should recommend N95s “for all pathogens that spread by the air.”

The CDC’s own Emerging Infectious Diseases published a study early in the COVID pandemic of systematic reviews of 14 RCTs, which found no “substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza” from wearing masks. Other research has also questioned whether N95s are an improvement in real-world settings.

The Canadian government and World Health Organization funded a study a year ago that found no statistically significant difference between N95s and surgical masks. A U.K. government meta-review last year found no real-world evidence that N95s and equivalent masks protect those at highest risk of severe COVID.

The CDC’s pushback on HICPAC’s recommendation has been flagged by a former Senate Finance Committee investigator, Paul Thacker. He argues that “N95s don’t really work at all unless they’ve been fit-tested, never soiled, and used only once.” The CDC did not respond to Thacker’s queries or those from Just the News. 

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/cdc-overrules-mask-advisors-and-its-own-research-finding-no-difference

Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Covid Vaccines Killed 14x More People Than They Saved

A new peer-reviewed study has confirmed what the eye-test suggested all along, proving that experimental Covid-19 mRNA vaccines killed far more people than they saved.

The study published in the prestigious Cureus journal analyzed reports from the initial phase 3 trials of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines that led to the shots being approved under Emergency Use Authorization in the United States.

The study found that efficacy rates for the vaccines were “Dramatically lower” than the pharmaceutical companies claimed.

The research scientists behind the study have urged world governments to immediately cease and desist using Covid-19 mRNA vaccinations in their territories.

Based on “Conservative assumptions, the estimated harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines greatly outweigh the rewards: for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections.”

Covid Vaccines Are Now Officially the Deadliest Drug In History and Nobody Is Allowed to Talk About It. The scientists also called for the immediate removal of Covid-19 vaccines from the childhood vaccination schedule.

Following the initial trials of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, it was widely claimed that the experimental mRNA vaccines had a 95 percent efficacy rate in terms of reduction of symptomatic Covid-19. 

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/peer-reviewed-study-finds-covid-vaccines-killed-14x-more-people-than-they-saved

mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Caused More Deaths Than Saved: Study

With considerably lower efficacy rates, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines cause more deaths than save lives, according to a new study whose researchers called for a “Global moratorium” on the shots and “Immediate removal” from childhood immunization schedule.

Based on “Conservative assumptions, the estimated harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines greatly outweigh the rewards: for every life saved, there were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mRNA injections.”

For every life saved by the jab, almost 14 lives would be lost due to the mRNA vaccine, the study stated.

In the Moderna trial, vaccinated individuals were more than two times at risk of experiencing AESI. “To put these findings in perspective, the official SAE rate for other vaccines is only 1-2 per million,” the Jan. 24 study said.

The 2020 analysis’ “Estimate based on the Pfizer trial data exceeds this benchmark by at least 600-fold.” Rushed Vaccines In the Jan. 24 study, researchers noted that the safety of mRNA products was “Never assessed” in a manner consistent with scientific standards for vaccines or for gene therapy products, which they claim is “The more accurate classification” for these jabs.

The researchers pointed out that several excess deaths, cardiac events, strokes, and other serious adverse events have wrongly been ascribed to COVID-19 rather than the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines since early 2021.

For the “Vast majority” of adults below 50 years of age, the perceived benefits of the mRNA vaccines were dwarfed by their “Potential disabling and life-threatening harm.” The study said older adults may be at higher risk of such harm.