A president has it harder, according to Special Counsel Jack Smith.
In the Justice Department’s prosecution of President Trump for contesting the 2020 election results, Smith argues that he may put Trump on trial for official presidential acts.
All that’s required to arrest Trump, says Smith, is that just over half of a biased Washington, D.C., grand jury conclude that his words or deeds fall within the vague wording of a rarely charged criminal statute.
In Smith’s telling, he may put a president on trial for standing in the Speaker’s Lobby off the House floor to urge congressmen to vote against certifying an election – but because voting is a legislative act, not the congressmen who stand three feet away and actually cast the votes as urged.
Jack Smith charged Trump with a fake crime, so a conviction may well be reversed.
Today, Smith is again bending the law through its snapping point, all so he can see “Trump Convicted” sprawled across NBC Nightly News right before voters go to the polls.
A unanimous Supreme Court should restore the federal courts’ reputation by denouncing “Javert” Jack Smith and his jurisprudence of jihad and announcing that it will take all due time to consider presidential immunity from criminal prosecution and to craft an opinion to stand the test of time, the timing of the election be damned.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/02/jack_smith_will_annoy_the_supreme_court.html
Last Chance For Freedom 